Tuesday Tidbits, November 30, 2010

Just a few quick notes, folks, of what has come ‘cross my desk these last few days. Am working on a deadline for a new project and need to grind out on that.

I had not heard of Dan Habib’s new documentary Including Samuel, which chronicles the Habib family’s efforts to include son Samuel, who has cerebral palsy, in all parts of their lives. I like what Phelps Sprinkle from Topics Education wrote about it and his own family at the blog Three Sticks: “If we could create the perfect learning environment for each kid, yet in a fully inclusive setting, each child could/would reach her potential. The reality, though, is that very few fully inclusive school settings exist.”

Just posted on the Post’s website: Jay Mathews talks with Randi Weingarten about the AFT’s approach to education reform. See also his latest blog post: “The biggest time wasters [during the school year]…are days just before holidays. Not much gets done. Students and teachers tend to fidget and watch the clock. Why not turn those empty hours into reading and writing days?”

Lastly, I had lunch this Monday with one of my former students – he works in LA, in the film industry after graduating from UCLA’s film school – and it was a joy. I know that I should’ve realized it before he and I sat down to nosh, but the students that I remember as being the most interesting, the most wonderfully outspoken and good humored, the sharpest – well, they still are. Just ’cause I haven’t seen them for some ten, 15, 20 years doesn’t mean that those qualities have changed or that they have lost them. For the most part they’re still the way they were when we discussed Macbeth or watched the shower scene from Psycho as the start to a film unit or road-tripped to a local theater to see An Asian Jockey in Our Midst – only more so, the years seasoning and exploring and expanding their sharpness, good humor, thoughtfulness, etc. I’d like to think that my English class added something to this mix – but, no, they were this way already, now that I think back, their former selves an initial iteration of what they would become.

I wonder what my middle and high school teachers would say about me if we had the chance to eat lunch and talk – Mr. Mungiguerra, my chemistry teacher, Mr. Pfeffer, who taught me social studies, Mrs. Drazba, in whose class I first read Shakespeare, Mrs. Fox, who introduced me to Flannery O’Connor. I do know what I would tell them – and thank them for: That their collective work with me sent me on my path to be a teacher. That would be a great start to our conversation.

Posted in Classroom, Federal policy, School, School district, Teachers, Teaching | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tuesday Tidbits, November 23, 2010

Have a great Thanksgiving holiday this week, kind readers!

The new Education Next is out and is very much worth reading. I was particularly interested in Mike Petrilli’s piece on differentiated instruction, something that was covered in this blog a few weeks ago. The article put the spotlight on the good work being done at Piney Branch Elementary School in Takoma Park, MD and its principal Bertram Generlette. (Small world: Bertram, a math educator, helped me with this webcast on the teaching of fractions.) Mike and Checker Finn also discuss differentiated instruction in this vid.

More from Education Next: Read this interesting piece on middle schools and Paul Peterson’s Wasting Talent: “Americans tend to think their local elementary and middle schools are much better than those of the nation as a whole. The problems with schools, people seem to believe, are found somewhere else: Schools are dreadful in the inner city, perhaps, or in other parts of the country, maybe. My local schools are just fine.”

Yesterday was Day of National Blogging for Real Education Reform, which I missed. 🙁 You can read more about it here and read posts at Cooperative Catalyst and see a compilation of blogs and posts at SpeEdChange. Even Secretary of Education Arne Duncan posted his thoughts.

Lastly, the Post’s Jay Mathews had a great post at his blog: “Two demographically similar and academically impressive…high schools…have been debating grades. Both schools have been accused of letting too many students pass their courses without learning the material. This is in line with what millions of Americans say about schools in general. But they disagree over whom to blame. Unmotivated students? Lazy teachers? Cowardly administrators? Short-sighted parents?”

Posted in Classroom, Principal, School, School district, Teaching | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

What makes for an effective principal?

I have worked with many principals during my career – those at the three schools when I taught, those that helped to implement the Modern Red SchoolHouse initiative when I was at that non-profit, those with which I have assisted as a consultant – and I have seen a wide variety of effectiveness. An ineffective leader shows him- or herself pretty quickly, no different from leaders in other organizational settings – for example, the building leader whose office was piled high with papers and notebooks and magazines, a hoarder’s warren, an analog for her cluttered mind. There was the principal whose door was shut all the time; I needed to battle through two administrative assistants to win the chance to knock on this leader’s door, and then, while in her office, she’d talk on the phone for 10 minutes, before acknowledging me. I was a peon, it seemed. Wonder how she made kids or parents feel.

The darn good principals take more time to show themselves – the ones with which I have worked do not showboat, preferring a quiet path to a loud one – but after a few hours with them, you see what they’re doing.

For example, Perry Hayes at Elgin’s Ellis Middle School has created what a colleague called a “leader-ful” school, asking his faculty to step up and take on various roles as part of that building’s school improvement agenda; principals like Perry distribute leadership out into the building rather than horde it. “I identify my strong people,” Perry wrote me, “or have people identify them for me – nominate them, I guess.” With this leadership team, Perry then talks a lot with his staff about goals for the school and involves everyone in developing and monitoring a plan for success. “And we’re sure to celebrate our successes,” he finished, “for nothing promotes positive team-building as much as success.”

That building, when I worked with it, was a well-oiled machine, with many good things happening at it. I have a feeling it still is.

What other characteristics have I seen that make for an effective leader? A few ideas.

1. It goes without saying: Effective school leaders focus on student achievement. Now they don’t do it like automatons; particularly during these last few years, I run into building leaders that are up to their eyeballs in data and numbers and the latest set of test scores, but all of that info seems to blind them to the day-to-day of the school, of the classroom. They seem to be making decisions solely from spreadsheets and do not get out much.

2. Effective principals like kids – and might be a little kid-like. I know: It should go without saying. But the door closers – those that hide in their offices – they don’t seem to derive much joy from that daily interaction with their charges. I like principals that are on the school’s front stoop, shaking hands with kids and saying, “Good morning.” Principals that kneel in the hallways so that they are eye-to-eye with a kindergartner. Principals that sit in a high school English class for the full period, to be part of that day’s discussion on Ethan Frome. Jared Cleveland, the superintendent of Arkansas’s Lavaca Public Schools and a former building leader, looks “for principals that care enough to make a home visit to a student’s house or ride the bus with a child that’s afraid to go alone. The principal must be out in the building, must be child-centered.” And Martha Cutts, the principal at DC’s Washington Latin Public Charter School, told me: “Students deserve a principal who knows their names, is fair and approachable.”

3. Martha continued: “Parents deserve a principal who genuinely sees them as partners in the education of the children, someone who is honest and open to hearing what parents have to say and who will communicate with them.” And so really effective principals communicate well with all constituent groups – not just parents but school board members, other elected officials, teachers and staff, school district personnel, people from the neighborhood, even their peers at other schools. Dealing with these various groups, good school leaders balance their political skill with a deep and honest empathy for constituents and their concerns. They’re not fake, and they do a terrific job following up with these people, tenacious in getting answers.

4. Effective principals hire well. They build orchestras in their schools, hiring oboists and tympanists and cellists who work hard to learn and play the same song – and play it skillfully, passionately, beautifully. Robb Rauh, the principal of Milwaukee College Prep, a pre-K-8 public charter school, wrote that the “most important qualities for a principal are doing deficit-based hiring on your administrative team,” as Robb hires people who are really strong in areas in which he is weak. And his teaching staff? “Mission-based hiring,” he told me.

Robb’s hiring reminds me of effective teaching: An effective teacher fully admits that she does not have all the answers and quickly gets her students in on that work, to get some answers; they’re not just recipients but full participants.

4. And lastly, at least for today’s entry: Effective principals are highly deliberate. Genie DePolo, a great friend from my Modern Red days and principal at NYC’s Manhattan Charter School, confirmed that for me when she and I talked this Monday. They’re not blown to and fro by the winds of the latest ed fad. If something’s not working at the school – a new language arts curriculum does not seem right, for example, or there’s the need for a better school-wide formative assessment tool – these building leaders gather all of the available information, engage their staff and their parents and other constituents (as appropriate) in conversations, and then develop and enact and monitor a plan to change what’s not working. I have been in too many schools where there’s some literal repository for the latest and greatest: a closet or classroom that has shelves filled with a barely used textbook series or boxes of unopened computer software. “We had money that we needed to spend by the year’s end,” I remember one principal telling me, “and someone told me that this software was really good.”

Think of those school principals that you count as highly effective: What characteristics did they show in your work with them? What more can you add to the above list?

Posted in Principal, School, School district | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Tuesday Tidbits, November 16, 2010

OK, just videos and just TED talks – a new kind of post for me. First, Reddit‘s Alexis Ohanian and his talk about Mr. Splashy Pants: “It’s OK to lose control.”

Second, Conrad Wolfram on teaching kids mathematics through computer programming.

And third: after moving to rural Bertie County, in North Carolina, Emily Pilloton teaches a design-build class to high school students – smart design and new opportunities in the poorest county in that state.

Posted in Classroom, School, Teachers, Teaching | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tuesday Tidbits, November 9, 2010

More on Race to the Top: In this piece in today’s Washington Post, a “Maryland legislative committee voted Monday to reject a new regulation requiring that half of teachers’ evaluations be based on student progress, calling into question the future of” the state’s $250 million Race to the Top money. I wonder if this might begin to happen in other states.

If you have not already, when do you plan to get your kid a laptop to take to school? Do you share my outrage – well, as outraged as mild-mannered me can get – that many elementary school students still have clunky binders and notebooks, that keyboarding’s not a regular part of the week, that more is not done in elementary schools with technology, from Skype chats with other schools to blogging to wikis to the use of tools like Prezi and Poll Everywhere? I don’t share the commonly held belief that the Internet is the Big Bad Wolf; yes, we hear about Internet ugliness weekly, but I believe that if we train our kids well and then oversee what they do on the web, as we might oversee their television viewing, they can be safe – and can live in the 21st century like the rest of us, with all the rich tools and potential for learning that comes with those tools.

And I’m certainly not arguing for tech for tech’s sake. It’s got to be connected to or a tool for learning, not some bell or whistle. For example, Harvard’s Chris Dede has done powerful work around middle school kids and gaming. See his project River City, “an interactive computer simulation for middle grades science students to learn scientific inquiry and 21st century skills.” For those that fear games as a part of school, the kind of game that immerses you in a virtual world, dig into the River City site. It represents a revolutionary idea about teaching and learning.

Hat tip to my friend Sylvia Martinez at the Generation YES blog, for news from the ConnectSafely site. This site “is for parents, teens, educators, advocates – everyone engaged in and interested in the impact of the social Web. The user-driven, all-media, multi-platform, fixed and mobile social Web is a big part of young people’s lives, and this is the central space – linked to from social networks across the Web – for learning about safe, civil use of Web 2.0 together.” In fact download ConnectSafely’s new Parents’ Guide to Facebook.

And do you know MIT’s Scratch? It’s a kid-friendly “programming language that makes it easy to create…interactive stories, animations, games, music, and art” and share these creations on the web.

Lastly, your student having trouble with algebra? Well, you can watch this scintillating webcast on the topic by yours truly, or you can read one of the new books out on the topic, just for students: Hot X: Algebra Exposed by Danica McKellar, formerly of The Wonder Years, or Algebra Word Problems from The Complete Idiot’s Guide series.

Posted in Classroom, Federal policy, School, School district | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Parents and selecting a new principal

Parents: How are principals selected in your school district? What sort of input do you have? How transparent is that process?

This summer, my son’s school needed a new principal fast – the previous one left abruptly in July – and one part of selecting that new principal was an evening meeting with the Community Superintendent for our cluster of schools, to review the selection process and to get parent input – what, for example, were the characteristics that we valued most for the school’s new leader? Ability to communicate? Instructional leadership? A collaborative leadership style?

To collect info about these characteristics, we got handed a bubble sheet; next to each bubble, there was a characteristic choice – 13 altogether and all good ones – and each parent was asked to identify five that he or she thought most important. We were also welcome to write comments on the back, for the Community Superintendent to read.

I remembered that we worked quietly and diligently at this task; there was no ballot box stuffing and only minor collusion between couples.

One parent’s comments that evening got me thinking about this activity: She was put off by the bubble sheets. In so many words: How can we select a principal, a human being about to lead a complex and, for us anxious parents, critically important organization, with a bubble answer sheet? It seemed mechanistic, superficial, bureaucratic. And to some degree she was right – but only if the bubble sheet was the sole data point.

Obviously it wasn’t. The Community Superintendent reminded us that we could write on the back of each sheet and that he would read and collate those answers. In concert with  the school’s PTA leadership, a group of parents were to be selected to be part of the team to interview the three finalists for the principalship, and I will assume that what we bubbled in that evening would serve as the basis for questions during those interviews. In a very short time frame , our district was doing what it could to gather input from 60+ parents and use that information to select the right leader.

I was pleased to see this process in place; sure, we all wish that we had more time to discuss the best next steps for the school and our new principal, but we didn’t, as school started just six weeks from that meeting date. In fact, it was really important that this well delineated process was in place for just this moment – when it needed to spring into action and have a person aboard quickly.

One of those three recommendations has special importance for today’s mathematics classrooms, the teaching in those classrooms, and the use of high quality online tools such as Guaranteach:
Posted in Parents, Principal, School, School district | Tagged , , | Leave a comment